• WHO. Big data and artificial intelligence for achieving universal health coverage: an international consultation on ethics. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2018.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Topol E. The Topol Review: preparing the healthcare workforce to deliver the digital future. National Health Service; 2019.

  • Kerasidou CX, Kerasidou A, Buscher M, Wilkinson S. Before and beyond trust: reliance in medical AI. J Med Ethics. 2022;48(11):852–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Knowles B, Richards JT, editors. The sanction of authority: Promoting public trust in ai. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency; 2021.

  • Ghafur S, Fontana G, Halligan J, O’Shaughnessy J, Darzi A. NHS data: maximising its impact on the health and wealth of the United Kingdom. Imperial College London; 2020.

  • Department of Health and Social Care. New data strategy to drive innovation and improve efficiency [press release]. 2022 13 June. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-data-strategy-to-drive-innovation-and-improve-efficiency. Accessed 01 June 2023.

  • Department of Health. Innovation Health and Wealth: Accelerating Adoption and Diffusion in the NHS. London, UK. 2011.

  • Department of Health. Best research for Best Health: A new national health research strategy. London, UK. 2006.

  • Temperton J. NHS care.data scheme closed after years of controversy. WIRED. 2016 6 July. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/care-data-nhs-england-closed. Accessed 01 June 2023.

  • Jayanetti C. NHS data grab on hold as millions opt out. The Observer. 2021 22 August. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/aug/22/nhs-data-grab-on-hold-as-millions-opt-out. Accessed 01 June 2023

  • Moberly T. Should we be worried about the NHS selling patient data? BMJ. 2020;368:m113.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation. Public attitudes to data and AI: Tracker survey (Wave 2). 2022 2 November. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-attitudes-to-data-and-ai-tracker-survey-wave-2/public-attitudes-to-data-and-ai-tracker-survey-wave-2. Accessed 01 June 2023.

  • Papoutsi C, Reed JE, Marston C, Lewis R, Majeed A, Bell D. Patient and public views about the security and privacy of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in the UK: results from a mixed methods study. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2015;15(1):86.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ipsos Mori. The one-way mirror: public attitudes to commercial access to health data. London: Wellcome Trust. 2016.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sheehan M, Friesen P, Balmer A, Cheeks C, Davidson S, Devereux J, et al. Trust, trustworthiness and sharing patient data for research. J Med Ethics. 2021;47(12):e26–e.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Graham M. Data for sale: trust, confidence and sharing health data with commercial companies. J Med Ethics. 2021.

  • Baier A. Trust and Antitrust. Ethics. 1986;96(2):231–60.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hawley K. Trust, distrust and commitment. Noûs. 2014;48(1):1–20.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Neill O. Trust, trustworthiness, and accountability. In: Morris N, Vines D, editors. Capital failure: rebuilding Trust in Financial Services. Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 172–190.

  • Jones K. Trust as an affective attitude. Ethics. 1996;107(1):4–25.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Möllering G. The nature of Trust: from Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology. 2001;35(2):403–20.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Luhmann N. Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives. In: Gambetta D, editor. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Blackwell; 1988.

  • O’Neill O. Autonomy and trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Pr; 2002.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wright S. Trust and trustworthiness. Philosophia. 2010;38(3):615–27.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Neill O. Linking Trust to Trustworthiness. Int J Philosophical Stud. 2018;26(2):293–300.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kerasidou A. Trustworthy institutions in Global Health Research Collaborations. In: Ganguli-Mitra A, Sorbie A, McMillan C, Dove E, Postan E, Laurie G, et al. editors. The Cambridge Handbook of Health Research Regulation. Cambridge Law Handbooks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021. pp. 81–9.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lucassen A, Montgomery J, Parker M. Ethics and the social contract for genomics in the NHS. In: DaviesSC, Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer 2016, Generation Genome. Department of Health, London.

  • Horn R, Kerasidou A. Sharing whilst caring: solidarity and public trust in a data-driven healthcare system. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1):110.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Warren M. Trust and democracy. In: Uslaner EM, editor. The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018. pp. 75–94.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Veitch K. Obligation and the changing nature of publicly funded Healthcare. Med Law Rev. 2018;27(2):267–94.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wellings DJD, Maguire D, Appleby J, Hemmings N, Morris J, Schlepper L. Public satisfaction with the NHS and social care in 2021: results from the British Social Attitudes survey. The King’s Fund; 2022.

  • NHS. The NHS Constitution for England. 2021 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-nhs-constitution-for-england/the-nhs-constitution-for-england. Accessed 01 June 2023.

  • Hill EM, Turner EL, Martin RM, Donovan JL. Let’s get the best quality research we can”: public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: a systematic review and qualitative study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:1–10.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wellcome Trust. Summary report of qualitative research into public attitudes to personal data and linking personal data. Wellcome Trust London; 2013.

  • Clemence M, Gilby N, Shah J, Swiecicka J, Warren D, Smith P et al. Wellcome Trust Monitor Wave 2: Tracking Public Views on Science. Biomedical Research and Science Education, London: Research, Ipsos Mori. 2013:148.

  • Ritchie O, Reid S, Smith L. Review of public and professional attitudes towards confidentiality of healthcare data: final report. General Medical Council; 2015.

  • Singleton P, Lea N, Tapuria A, Kalra D. Public and Professional attitudes to privacy of healthcare data: a survey of the literature. General Medical Council. 2007.

  • Ghafur S, Van Dael J, Leis M, Darzi A, Sheikh A. Public perceptions on data sharing: key insights from the UK and the USA. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(9):e444–e6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones LA, Nelder JR, Fryer JM, Alsop PH, Geary MR, Prince M, et al. Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK. BMJ Open. 2022;12(4):e057579.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Understanding Patient Data. Public attitudes to the use of patient data 2010–2018 and 2018–2021. https://understandingpatientdata.org.uk/how-do-people-feel-about-use-data. Accessed 01 June 2023.

  • Buckingham H, Dayan M. Privatisation in the English NHS: fact of fiction? Nuffield Trust [Internet]. 2019 15 November. https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/news-item/privatisation-in-the-english-nhs-fact-or-fiction. Accessed 01 June.

  • Squires M. Is the NHS a business? British Journal of Medical Practice. 2014;64(622):257–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bayliss K. Can England’s National Health System reforms overcome the neoliberal legacy?. Int J Health Serv. 2022;52(4):480–91.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moberly T. Ten things you need to know about the Health and Care Bill. BMJ. 2022;376:o361.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chico V, Hunn A, Taylor M. Public views on sharing anonymised patient-level data where there is a mixed public and private benefit. NHS Health Research Authority, University of Sheffield School of Law. 2019.

  • Department of Health and Social Care. Digital transformation in the NHS. National Audit Office. 2020 May 15.

  • Faulkner-Gurstein R, Wyatt D. Platform NHS: reconfiguring a public service in the age of digital capitalism. Science, Technology & Human Values. 2021. p.1–21.

  • Department of Trade and Industry. Bioscience 2015: Improving National Health, Increasing National Wealth. Biotechnology Innovation and Growth Team. London, UK. 2003.

  • NHS. The NHS Constitution for England 2013. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/170656/NHS_Constitution.pdf. Accessed 01 June 2023

  • Grace J, Taylor MJ. Disclosure of confidential patient information and the duty to consult: the role of the Health and Social Care Information Centre. Med Law Rev. 2013;21(3):415–47.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vezyridis P, Timmons S. Dissenting from care.data: an analysis of opt-out forms. J Med Ethics. 2016;42(12):792–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Taylor M. Information governance as a force for good – Lessons to be Learnt from Care.Data. SCRIPTed. 2014;11:1.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • NHS Digital. National Data Opt-out. 2020. https://digital.nhs.uk/services/national-data-opt-out/operational-policy-guidance-document. Accessed 01 June 2023.

  • NHS. Your NHS Data Matters: When your choice about sharing data from your health records does not apply. https://www.nhs.uk/your-nhs-data-matters/where-your-choice-does-not-apply/. Accessed 01 June 2023.

  • Rocher L, Hendrickx JM, de Montjoye Y-A. Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3069.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meszaros J, Ho CH. Building trust and transparency? Challenges of the opt-out system and the secondary use of health data in England. Med Law Int. 2019;19(2?3):159–81.

  • Department of Health. Confidentiality: NHS Code of Practice. 2003.

  • Kudyba S, Kwatinetz M. Introduction to the Big Data Era. In: Kudyba S, editor. Big Data, Mining, and Analytics. CRC Press. 2014. p. 1–17.

  • Ruckenstein M, Schüll ND. The datafication of Health. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2017;46(1):261–78.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sharon T, Lucivero F. Introduction to the Special Theme: The expansion of the health data ecosystem?Rethinking data ethics and governance. 2019;6(2): 1–5.

  • Hallowell N. Research or clinical care: what’s the difference? J Med Ethics. 2018;44:359–60.

  • BBC News. Everyone ‘to be research patient’, says David Cameron. 2011 5 December. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16026827. Accessed 1 June 2023.

  • Wienroth M, Pearce C, McKevitt C. Research campaigns in the UK National Health Service: patient recruitment and questions of valuation. Sociol Health Illn. 2019;41(7):1444–61.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Birch K. Rethinking value in the bio-economy: Finance, assetization, and the management of value. Sci Technol Hum Values. 2017;42(3):460–90.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Department of Health and Social Care. Data Saves Lives: reshaping health and social care with data. London, UK. 2022.

  • Horn R, Kerasidou A. Sharing whilst caring: solidarity and public trust in a data-driven healthcare system. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21:110.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Murgia M, Harlow M. NHS shares English hospital data with dozens of companies. Financial Times. 2021 27 July. https://www.ft.com/content/6f9f6f1f-e2d1-4646-b5ec-7d704e45149e. Accessed 1 June 2023.

  • Goldacre B, MacKenna B. The NHS deserves better use of hospital medicines data. BMJ. 2020;370.

  • Sadowski J. Rethinking Data- blog series. 2022 1 June. https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/blog/political-economy-data-intermediaries/. Accessed 1 June 2023.

  • Powles J, Hodson H. Google DeepMind and healthcare in an age of algorithms. Health and technology. 2017;7(4):351–67.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Srnicek N. Platform Capitalism. John Wiley & Sons. 2017.

  • Sharon T. The googlization of health research: from disruptive innovation to disruptive ethics. Per Med. 2016;13(6):563–74.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prainsack B. The political economy of digital data: introduction to the special issue. Policy Stud. 2020;41(5):439–46.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Staa T-P, Goldacre B, Buchan I, Smeeth L. Big health data: the need to earn public trust. BMJ. 2016;354:i3636.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • NHS Digital. Care Information Choices – April 2016. HYPERLINK https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/care-information-choices/care-information-choices-april-2016. Accessed 1 June 2023.

  • Godlee F. What can we salvage from care.data? BMJ. 2016;354:i3907.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sterckx S, Rakic V, Cockbain J, Borry P. “You hoped we would sleep walk into accepting the collection of our data”: controversies surrounding the UK care. data scheme and their wider relevance for biomedical research. Med Health Care Philos. 2016;19:177–90.

  • BBC News. Palantir: NHS faces legal action over data firm contract. 2021 24 February. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technoogy-56183785. Accessed 1 June 2023.

  • Ungoed-Thomas J. Controversial ?360m NHS England data platform ‘lined up’ for Trump backer’s firm. 2022 13 November. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/nov/13/controversial-360m-nhs-england-data-platform-lined-up-for-trump-backers-firm. Accessed 1 June 2023.

  • Harris J. Scientific research is a moral duty. J Med Ethics. 2005;31(4):242–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rhodes R. In defense of the duty to participate in Biomedical Research. Am J Bioethics. 2008;8:37.

  • Schaefer GO, Emanuel EJ, Wertheimer A. The obligation to participate in biomedical research. JAMA. 2009;302(1):67–72.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prainsack B, Buyx A. Solidarity in biomedicine and beyond. Cambridge University Press; 2017.

  • Shapshay S, Pimple KD. Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris. J Med Ethics. 2007;33(7):414–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rennie S. Viewing research participation as a moral obligation: in whose interests? Hastings Cent Rep. 2011;41(2):40–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Neuhaus CP. Does Solidarity require “All of Us” to participate in Genomics Research? Hastings Cent Rep. 2020;50(S1):62–69.

  • de Melo-Martín I. A duty to Participate in Research: does Social Context Matter? Am J Bioeth. 2008;8(10):28–36.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • NHS. The NHS Long Term Plan: Research and innovation to drive future outcomes improvement. 2019.

  • McCartney M. Care.data: why are Scotland and Wales doing it differently? BMJ. 2014;348.

  • Viens AM. Neo-liberalism, austerity and the political determinants of health. Health Care Anal. 2019;27(3):147–52.

  • Stockdale J, Cassell J, Ford E. “Giving something back”: a systematic review and ethical enquiry into public views on the use of patient data for research in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:6.

  • Aitken M, Porteous C, Creamer E, Cunningham-Burley S. Who benefits and how? Public expectations of public benefits from data-intensive health research. Big Data & Society. 2018;July–December:1–12.

  • Taylor-Gooby P, Wallace A. Public values and public trust: responses to welfare state reform in the UK. J social policy. 2009;38(3):401–19.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Walsh A. Commercialisation and the corrosion of the ideals of medical professionals. In: Therese Feiler JH, Andrew, Papanikitas, editors. Marketisation, Ethics and Healthcare: policy, practice and moral formation. Routledge; 2018. pp. 133–46.

  • Marmot M, Bell R. Social inequalities in health: a proper concern of epidemiology. Ann Epidemiol. 2016;26(4):238–40.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • link

    By admin

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *